Cold Fusion
Are you looking at investing in
alternative energy solutions? Here is an overview of cold
fusion to help with your investment research ...
 |
|
When the idea of cold fusion was first kicked around
scientific think-tanks, it was seen as an excellent end to the
energy crisis. Unlike nuclear fission, which breaks apart
big atoms like uranium to produce power, nuclear fusion
combines small molecules like hydrogen and helium to produce
power. Nuclear fission, though relatively safe and
efficient, produces large amounts of dangerous radioactive
waste which don't decay for hundreds of years and give off
dangerous radiation. Fusion, in comparison, produces
hardly any radioactive waste. Unfortunately, the only
fusion experiments that have been successful have been
thermonuclear and occur at millions of degrees Celsius, usually
exploding and melting things and generally making a mess of
everything. So scientists postulated that they could
create fission reactions (relatively) near room temperature and
in (relatively) unpressurized environments, creating a great
deal of power out of easily accessible materials while
producing a very small amount of waste. This procedure
was called "cold fusion."
The main problem with cold fusion is that it doesn't work,
or at least it hasn't worked yet. Hot fusion has worked,
but so far it's been nearly impossible to control or
maintain. When reactions occurring at millions of degrees
Celsius are difficult to control it generally makes scientists
and laymen alike a bit nervous, so most experts are hoping that
cold fusion will be the answer to our problems.
In 1987 two separate teams worked on cold fusion in Utah,
Fleischmann and Pons and Stephen Jones. Neither team knew
of the others' work until they submitted their papers for peer
review. They had planned to release their papers
simultaneously, but Pons and Fleischmann acted a day sooner
than Jones and held their press release early. Jones then
fired his article off to Nature, the rush to publish the
findings caused quite a stir in national media. Much of
the media buzz subsided quickly though, since the experiments
weren't matching up to the proposed results. Peer review
produced a string of failed experiments, and after the
government investigated they found no evidence that cold fusion
had been achieved. Though some cold fusion research is
still being carried out and advances are still being made, most
experiments are done by professors or retired professors
working on shoestring budgets. In general, though we may
still see reliable cold fusion reactors in our lifetime,
combining hydrogen and helium to produce clean, plentiful
energy, for the time being it's best not to hold your
breath.
For more information about investing in shares, share
trading and the stock market, see the "resources" section of
this website, or go to articles about investing in shares.
The information contained on this website is for information
purposes only. See our disclaimer for full details.
|